Bronwyn and I take a look at the second series of the Doctor Who BBC reboot starring David Tennant and Billie Piper. So this season picks up right where the previous one left off; that of Eccleston’s Doctor regenerating and becoming Tennant, but it isn’t all fishsticks and custard for our cheeky time lord, as he must fend off an alien invasion while contending with a bad fever. Rose is rattled by these new developments, as is the audience, but it won’t take long before Tennant wins our hearts.
“I like the way the BBC makes television; usually 12 to 13, maybe 14 episodes and a Christmas Special, but that is a Doctor Who tradition, basically proceeds from the Christmas Specials are donated to charities, which is fantastic and I wish American television would adopt such a policy, and with the 12 to 13 episode format per series (what we call seasons here, across the pond in the Colonies), you can look at your series as a solid movie. Producers receive production budget money and then they set about shooting chunks of episodes, as when a particular actor is cast, they can have everything to shoot with that actor and also make use of the sets over a grouping of episodes, and they do this to save money. It’s an ingenious system and I think American television shows are adopting this practice. I know the Cable channels have been doing this because they also keep to smaller seasons and story-arcs.”
American television production (as I mentioned, beginning to adopt this process) is still decades behind the BBC. This is an economical and efficient process with regard to shooting; applying these very impressive visual effects, sound work – all of this on time and within budget. I have noticed certain productions, namely “Bates Motel” and “Hannibal” (usually shows with smaller per-season commitments) are toying with this idea. Rather than slavishly following a 22 to 24 episode season, and figuring out how to stretch it out, this new wave of production tells the story of a television like a movie – one long narrative.
“It’s obvious that Russell T. Davies was a voracious fan of American television, which is one of the reasons this reboot of Doctor Who works very well for American audiences. Eccleston is more television-friendly than half the lot of original Doctors from previous series. The Doctor most audiences were familiar with before this reboot was Tom Baker, with the crazy hair and the scarf, and also Sarah Jane. So, at least to my admittedly limited knowledge, the Daleks seem to be ret-conned a little. When Star Trek: The Next Generation introduced the Borg, they were obviously influenced by the Daleks, changing “exterminate” to “assimilate”, but then I think Davies borrows back from Star Trek to refine his particular Dalek creation, same with the Cybermen who will appear in the second series in 2006.”
“Steven Moffat shows, at least in my opinion, why he’s the best writer of the series, the show and the most significant. He created the characters Jack Harkness and River Song, who figures prominently in later seasons. She was introduced three years later in another important two-parter, “Forest of the Dead” and “Silence in the Library” and then she figures in the Matt Smith series. I like his style. He isn’t interested in explaining everything, he just goes all in. “Just go with it” would be his motto, and the modus operandi of all science fiction writers. He usually wrote one episode per season, such as “Blink” or “The Girl in the Fireplace”, two excellent episodes.”
This is something I don’t get into, but I think Moffat is more of a writer than a producer, or writer/producer. The producer will work a narrative to conform to his or her budget. The writer/producer will write a story or preliminary draft to fit within the confines of the budget, but the writer just goes mad, writes everything down, and, as I say, he doesn’t care for the consequences of either overreaching or failing to explain everything away.
“It almost feels like the end of a show, the end of a series, and it would be, but for the presence of Rose to keep us viewers connected, and this happens in the Doctor Who-ni-verse often; he closes a door and opens a window in the form of David Tennant, who is my personal favorite as The Doctor, but Eccleston is a fabulous primer for the reboot. What Eccleston builds, Tennant improves upon. He uses Eccleston as a springboard and his manic energy, humor, and anger compliment the tenth doctor.”
Bronwyn and I have already recorded our thoughts about the second series, introducing David Tennant to the world as the Tenth Doctor, and that episode will premiere in April (sorry, big back-log here in BlissVille). We will continue on and review more series as we have time, so I hope you’ll join us.
Questions? Comments? email@example.com
Bronwyn and I are big fans of Doctor Who. Since the 2005 reboot of the show, we’ve watched every episode more than a couple of times. We enjoy the commentary, the discussion, and the various debates that pop up from time to time, so we thought it would be fun to record our observations of this first series of the show featuring Christopher Eccleston and Billie Piper. If you’re a fan of the show, I’m sure you’ll enjoy this episode.
“The series introduces the newly-regenerated Ninth Doctor (Eccleston) sometime after his involvement in the Time War, which the Doctor claims wiped out all of the Time Lords (save himself) and the Daleks. The Doctor meets Rose Tyler (Piper), a young woman working in a department store in contemporary London. Rose is fascinated by the Doctor and joins him in adventures in space and time with his TARDIS, though her behavior worries her mother Jackie (Camille Coduri) and boyfriend Mickey Smith (Noel Clarke), particularly after one instance where she goes missing for twelve months. The Doctor and Rose’s travels bring them to meet Captain Jack Harkness (John Barrowman), a Time Agent from the 51st century who joins them as a companion. During their travels, they are unaware that the words “Bad Wolf” appear near them on their travels, such as graffiti written on walls. The Doctor becomes aware of the frequent reappearance of the word and suspects it is some sign of things to come that is following them.”
Questions? Comments? firstname.lastname@example.org